The son of man: “Is it constructive theology and history of Jesus for the New Testament writing?”

Authors

  • Halim Wiryadinata STT Pelita Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46494/psc.v16i2.91

Keywords:

Son of Man, Jesus, representative, High Priest, man, God

Abstract

Many scholars and lay people try to figure out the reasons why the Lord Jesus
Christ uses the title of the son of man to designate Himself. He uses the title of
the son of man throughout the Gospels, but there are some incidents only appear outside of the Gospels. This appearance is impressing to find out the reasons why the term occurrences in the Gospel. However, the term also appears in few passages outside the Gospels. Therefore, using the method of critical analysis through the library research as the qualitative methodology in order to seek the development of the argument from beginning up today and to see how the New Testament scholars clear up the message of Jesus in using that title. Few scholars comment that term has significant for the Christological development of the New Testament due to the messianic proclamation as the
saviour of the world. Furthermore, the idea of representative between man and
God apparently introduces the idea of the high priest in the New Testament
writing for Jesus’ Christology. This idea will bring the consumption for Biblical
Theology when scholars seek this terminology in the New Testament writing.

References

Allison, Dale C., and Delbert Burkett. “The Son of Man Debate: A History and Evaluation.” Journal of Biblical Literature, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/3268537.

Ashton, John. “The Johannine Son of Man: A New Proposal.” New Testament Studies, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688511000178.

Black, Matthew. “Servant of the Lord and Son of Man.” Scottish Journal of Theology 6, no. 1 (1953): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930600005305.

Bruce, F. F. The Real Jesus. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1985.

Campbell, J. Y. “The Origin and Meaning of the Term of Son of Man.” Journal of Theological Studies 191, no. 2 (1947).

Casey, M. Son of Man: The Interpretation and Influence of Daniel 7. London: SPCK, 1979.

Charlesworth, J. H. The Old Testament Pseudigrapha and the New Testament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

Collins, John J. “Apocalyptic Genre and Mythic Allusions in Daniel.” JSOT 21 (1981): 83–100.

Cullmann, Oscar. The Christology of the New Testament. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1963.

Dalman, G. The Word of Jesus. London: SCM Press, 1909.

Davies, Philip R. “Dualism and Echatology.” Brill 30, no. 1 (1980): 93–97.

Dodd, C. H. According to the Scriptures. London: Nisbet, 1952.

Fuller, R. H. Foundations of New Testament Christology. Collins: Fontana Library of Theology and Philosophy, 1969.

Ginsberg, H. L. “The Oldest Interpretation of the Suffering Servant.” Vetus Testamentum 63, no. 10 (2013): 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-99000005.

Green, William S. Dictionary of Judaism in the Biblical Period. Massachuttes: Hendrickson Publishers, 1996.

Hamzah, Amir. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Malang: Literasi Nusantara, 2020.

Hooker, M. D. “R. H. Fuller, The Foundations of New Testament Christology.” Religious Studies 7, no. 3 (1971): 288–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412500002262.

Ladd, George E. A Theology of the New Testament. Michigan: William B Eerdmans, 1993.

Leim, E. Joshua. “In the Glory of His Father: Intertextuality and Apocalyptic Son of Man in the Gospel of Mark.” Journal of Theological Interpretation 7, no. 2 (2013): 213–32.

Longenecker, Richard N. “Son of Man as A Self - Designation of Jesus.” Journal of the Evangelical Society 12, no. 3 (1969): 151–63.

Lourié, Basil. “The ‘Synoptic Apocalypse’ (Mt 24-25 Par.) and Its Jewish Source.” Journal of Patrology and Critical Hagiography 11, no. 1 (2015): 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-00111p11.

Luz, U. “The Son of Man in Matthew: Heavenly Judge or Human Christ.” JSNT 3, no. 21 (1992): 3–20.

Marshall, I. Howard. “The Son of Man.” In Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels, edited by I Marshall Green, Joel B , McKnight Scott, and Howard. Leicester: IVP, 1992.

Moule, C. F.D. “‘The Son of Man’: Some of the Facts.” New Testament Studies 41, no. 2 (1995): 277–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500021287.

Nel, Marius. “‘Son of Man’ in the Gospel of Mark.” In Die Skriflig / In Luce Verbi 51, no. 3 (2017): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v51i3.2096.

Pokorny, Petr. The Genesis of Christology. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt GmbH, 1985.

Richardson, Alan. An Introduction to the Theology of the New Testament. London: SCM Press, 1958.

Rumbay, Christar Arstilo. “Christology in Digital Era: A Socio-Systematic Theology Contribution to the Sustainable Smart City.” Pasca Journal 6, no. 2 (2020): 15–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46494/psc.v16i1.70.

Salvesen, Alison G. “The Solution to the ‘Son of Man’ Problem.” Journal of Jewish Studies, 2013. https://doi.org/10.18647/3127/jjs-2013.

Wiryadinata, Halim. “An Analysis of Economic Wealth of God’s People from Nomadic to Post Exilic Era.” DUNAMIS: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristiani 3, no. 2 (2019): 155. https://doi.org/10.30648/dun.v3i2.184.

Witherington, Ben. The Christology of Jesus. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1990.

Zed, Mestika. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan obor Indonesia, 2004.

Published

2020-11-05